Skip to main content

Federal Court Australia trial for duty (urgent) applications

/
Content updates

On 3 February 2025 Chief Justice Mortimer of the Federal Court issued a “Notice to the Profession” announcing a trial of a new practice for listing and determining duty (urgent) applications in all registries of the Court.

The Chief Justice said that the object of the trial is to seek to “better manage the listing and determination of duty work in the context of the Court’s National Court Framework which uses the individual docket structure”. This has been supplemented by the publication of a new general practice note.

Mortimer CJ explained:

The GPN-DUTY practice note formalises some aspects of the Court’s existing practice in relation to duty applications and also introduces a new requirement in the form of a certificate of urgency that must be provided in support of a duty application. The form of the certificate of urgency is set out in Annexure A to the GPN-DUTY practice note. An applicant or their legal representative must certify, amongst other things, that they have read and thoroughly familiarised themselves with the GPN-DUTY practice note. The certificate of urgency provided by the applicant will be considered by the relevant Duty Judge to determine whether a duty application is attended by sufficient urgency to justify the application (or part of the application) being determined by a Duty Judge on an urgent basis outside the usual Docket and/or Specialty List Arrangements.

The Notice helpfully lists a first point of contact for urgent applications, the information to be provided to the Court and the manner for filing urgent applications.

The Court will monitor and assess whether the trial should be extended and/or modified. Feedback can be submitted by Practitioners via DutyTrial@fedcourt.gov.au

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This topic is relevant to the law, practice and regulation of Australian Courts which is covered in several publications including the commentary of Thomson Reuters’ Federal Court Practice and Injunctions Law and Practice. These publications fall within the Court Practice and Procedure Practice Area on Westlaw that has many services designed to complement each other to provide the breadth of coverage of a single compendium but with the in-depth analysis that specific focus areas will allow. In addition, the Alert and the report series will also enable practitioners to keep up to date with pertinent caselaw. To subscribe to the Federal Court Practice or Injunctions Law and Practice  on Westlaw, contact Thomson Reuters.

Federal Court Practice

Cassandra Siciliano
By Cassandra Siciliano
Senior Publishing Editor

Cassandra is an experienced Senior Publishing Editor in the Analytical Law Team at Thomson Reuters with a history of over 30 years working in the information services industry after leaving practice in the Banking and Finance sector. She holds a Bachelor of Law from Sydney University. At Thomson Reuters, she has worked in areas including writing for Industrial Relations and Anti-Money Laundering publications, undertaken extensive indexing of both new and updated publications, commissioning across the Team’s portfolio and edited a wide range of works.

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.