Skip to main content

Justice William Gummow on the value of authorised law reports

/
Content updates

In the latest edition of the Thomson Reuters Public Law Review journal, former High Court Justice William Gummow AC and Oxford postgraduate candidate Harry Sanderson, highlight the value of authorised reports - particularly reported arguments - in the study and practice of law.

In the article, Gummow and Sanderson use eight Australian and UK cases as examples to support their case. According to the authors:

Reports of argument frequently contain information which is valuable to an understanding of the reasons for judgment in a given case. Even the sorriest set of submissions inflicted on a court by counsel will colour a comprehensive understanding of the final authority, in the manner in which they are dismissed. Where an approach is accepted, it will form the basis of the eventual statement of law by the court.

Contemporary legal education, and the practice of law which follows, place insufficient emphasis upon the importance of authorised reports, and reports of argument in particular. This section considers reasons for this trend, and the possibility for its reversal, after examining reports of arguments in eight major decisions in public and private law of Australian and United Kingdom courts of final appeal. In each instance, we contend the reported argument significantly assists an understanding of the final decision in question.
 

Read the article, published as (2021) 32 PLR 177, on new Westlaw here.

By Tim Pollard

General Manager of the Australian Legal Portfolio at Thomson Reuters Legal

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.