Latest updates to Victorian Courts
New commentary
- Onus to establish interference reasonable etc., at [CHRRA.7.40].
- Amending defamation proceedings, at [LAA23B.20].
- Documents tendered as evidence of contents but not as to truth, at [EA.48.60].
- Criminal proceedings pending, at [MCA.100.550].
Updated Commentary
- Chopsonion Pty Ltd (controllers appt) v Watts Meat Machinery Pty Ltd (No 2) [2025] FCA 4: Time did not begin to run in relation to claims under s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law “until the lenders ascertained they were not going to recover the full amount they were owed, through either a sale…or through realisation of security, or otherwise…”. See [LAA5.220].
- Haque v Victoria [2024] VSC 703: the term “speciality” in s 5(3) refers to contracts under seal. See [LAA5.260].
- Agrigrain Pty Ltd v Rindfleish [2024] NSWCA 295: where an injured worker has no clear understanding “of the way in which the corporate group in which he is employed is organised and does not appreciate which entity is the correct defendant”, the cause of action is not “discoverable” until he knows the identity of that defendant. See [LAA27F.20].
- Parkin v Boral Ltd [2025] FCA 70: a lay witness cannot give evidence except from his own knowledge. See [EA.79.20].
- Queensland v Mr Stradford (a pseudonym) [2025] HCA 3: the Court held that officers acting to enforce or execute orders or warrants made or issued by the Federal Circuit Court were acting pursuant to their legal duty. See [MCA14.20].
- Styche v Bourke [2025] ACTCA 5: the ACT Court of Appeal has held that the failure of a magistrate to give reasons does not necessarily provide a basis for a successful appeal. See [MCA109.100] and [MCA109.120]
- Harlech Enterprises Pty Ltd v Beno Excavations Pty Ltd [2025] NSWCA 5: where a garnishee order has been made pursuant to a judgement, and that judgement is subsequently set aside, the monies paid pursuant to the garnishee order are recoverable. There is no discretion to refuse relief under the general law. See [MCA111.60].
- Birketu Pty Ltd v Atanaskovic [2025] HCA 2: the High Court has now made it clear that solicitor litigants may properly charge in respect of work done by employees of the firm. See [MCA131.90].
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Victorian Courts This service provides coverage across all jurisdictions and at all levels – from the Magistrates Court to the County and Supreme Courts for both civil and criminal matters. The critical analysis of the law assists you when considering appeals and arguments. Current commentary ensures you have access to the latest information. Detailed indexing and paragraphing make information easy to find.
Victorian Courts enables you to purchase either a complete library covering all Courts or more specific information to suit your needs.
This service falls within the Court Practice & Procedure Practice Area on Westlaw that has many services designed to complement each other to provide the breadth of coverage of a single compendium but with the in-depth analysis that specific focus areas will allow. In addition, the Alert and the report series will also enable practitioners to keep up to date with pertinent caselaw. When taken in its entirety, the Court Practice & Procedure Practice Area will furnish subscribers with a full picture of Court Practice & Procedure in the respective jurisdictions without the necessary restrictions of single services. To subscribe to the Court Practice & Procedure Practice Area on Westlaw, contact Thomson Reuters.